Monday, December 31, 2007
Living in the penultimate
In the Spring of 2003, when I began at Columbia Seminary, I took the last class Walter Brueggemann would teach to non-doctoral students, before his apotheosis into an emeritus faculty. Cousin Cheryl was in that class, as well as some other friends. We took a class on Old Testament Theology and our text was Walter's book on Old Testament Theology - his magnum opus that looked at the older testament as a meeting place of testimonies with divergent trajectories of justice and purity, testimony and counter testimony, where the text creates a world of 'differance'. One of the things I took from this class is the impossibility of having the last word - or in some ways, the danger of presuming the last word. Ecclesiastes says that of the making of books there is no end, and She's right: this verse is descriptive of the ancient perception that a last word is impossible. Impossible in these ways: such a last word's use becomes inadequate to explain the quandaries of tomorrow; such a last word becomes irrelevant the longer it is untested by new circumstances - that is, such a last word becomes an idol. In this way, such a last word becomes a mask that hinders looking at the thing itself. And so it is that a last word is non-resistant to evolution.
The problem is that people demand certainty. Certainty I believe is the graven image that God warns us about in the ten words.
And so we're opened up into a world of questions, where even authority is questioned. Authority depends on inerrancy, but where inerrancy is questioned there is freedom. It will be sometimes claimed that authority grants some special freedom, but that is the freedom it wants you to have. What is that exactly?
I've posted two images of the same painting: "out of chaos" that I painted during chapel week in 2005. Each image is of the same state, yet different color ratios obtain. I can not tell you which is the final word on this image. Even if we should determine a correct color ratio, questions of scale would remain. Over the passage of time, with the possible loss of the originals, such questions proliferate.
Hence the need to state and restate. That is the freedom penultimacy gives us, the freedom to reexamine and evaluate. Of course this feels uncomfortable: in the midst of change individuals cling to things stated as certain, wanting to conserve some absolute place where things are as they remember them. Such a place is an idol, an illusion.
Why has God put us in such a world? A world where we are exiled from the certainties we grew up with. A world where we find ourselves in search of new orientations.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
We've been married one year
And it's been a wonderful year. A year ago we were married at Oakhurst, dined with family and friends at Sala in Virginia Highlands, and packed for a trip to London. The above photos were taken in London, probably the pub in Hampstead where we'd visited Keats' house.
A year later we're in Jackson Hole, WY with our family. Today Jami went snowboarding - trees whizzing past her, while I sauntered over in the snow to the Star Bucks, where I drank an Americano and drew cowboy pictures, while reading Barth's Humanity of God. Tuesday we're going snow shoeing. Tomorrow we're visiting the Wildlife museum. I'm expecting lots of party relics, remnants of various Elk and Moose happenings.
It's a Wild Life is the little remarked sequel to It's a Wonderful Life. The children of It's a Wonderful Life grow up to protest the Vietnam war and join the counterculture, funding a commune called Pot R Ville with their inheritance from the savings and loan.
A year later and we're both ecstatic. I love her very much.
Thanks to all reading this who were there last year.
Friday, December 28, 2007
Holiday fun
Thursday, December 27, 2007
skating
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
The drawing for an earlier post
Faced with the problem of a vast plain of people I drew hot air balloons as an alternative. The people keep a coming but the passage of the train goes unremarked.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
Christmas: the most wunderbarishe Zeit des Jahrens
I have a story like Jami's Snorky story. But I don't have time to write it now. Here's photos of slides of me at Christmas when I was 7. I think I was 7. Batman was big. I got a bike. Jami comments on the bottom slide that I'm smiling but my dad and granny Wise are quite somber. We looked through photographs and we didn't have one of dad smiling anywhere. Whether he was holding me as an infant on the front porch of my great grandparent's house, standing in front of a personnel carrier in Germany (that's understandable), or posing with a friend in their Boy Scout uniforms - dad remains somber.
We'll see him and granny Wise today and I'll take a photo.
And I have an observation: last night we went to the Christmas Eve service at Oakhurst and I noticed during Silent Night that it shares some melody and rhythm with Blow the Man Down.
Try it. You have to slow Blow the Man Down down a bit. Blow the man down is a cantus firmus for Silent Night. Or maybe it's Silent Night that's the cantus firmus. Blow the Man Down might be more a ostinato.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Merry Christmas
My last post, which while I was writing it, seemed like a comedic tour de force of bathos, erudition, and existential reverie, in the mode of Beckett, instead was a dense, recursive jungle of syntax. I realized this last night when I was talking to Jami, who had attempted at least twice to move through it but was repulsed. She promises she'll keep trying. She's lovely and wonderful, but I know that it may just not be worth the effort. I still like it, though; it is my grotesque child.
Here's the gist: a verse is sung in a holiday hymn where people, who've made a good faith effort to come for a train, discover that there was only one train and that it has moved on without them. You might as well sing a hymn about Vladimir and Estragon waiting for Godot, except that this would be "just missing Godot."
Let's not start that again.
Here I've put up three Christmas card images I drew 7 years ago. One image I couldn't find, but which I have a paper copy of somewhere in my stored papers at the apartment, is of Santa swigging back a Coke, captioned overhead: "Congratulations! It's December 26th and you've just finished laying off the last of 20,000 elves - the stock will go through the roof! In the Spirit of the holidays, have a Coke and a Smile."
These three depict Santa as Lecher; as falling asleep with the remote in one hand, his cigarette having fallen out of the other onto the carpet where it'll make a nice bonfire; and as Nietzschean anti-hero, shaking his fist at the heavens.
What is this antipathy I have toward Santa? What has made him the object of my shadowy projections?
Oh Yeah.
Well more fodder for my counseling session.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
The People keep a coming but the train done gone
Advent gives us the word "adventure". I remember a sermon of my friend Karl's where, in explaining Advent, he reminded us that Christmas is not the same as Advent: Christmas is a destination, but Advent is about not arriving yet. I got the sense that Advent, like Holy Saturday that separates Good Friday from Easter, is too infrequently enjoyed, savored, experienced, mostly because people have a low tolerance for delayed gratification. We've got to get to the point; things have to be about something and we've got to get there. And so the danger is that weeks before Christmas people want to sing hymns about the baby being born in the manger. Advent says, "not yet." "Don't open the presents; don't read the last page; don't fast forward to the ending." Instead live in the present, live with not knowing, live with expectation: all of which go against our nature, our desire for closure, our desire to read the epilogue. Advent is an adventure of non-closure, an opportunity to hear God's story that winds around and suffers so many digressions that the point is buried like a seed in the earth. Can we enjoy such a journey?
This Sunday at Oakhurst we sang a hymn about the baby in the manger (why so early?) with the refrain I quoted in the title: De Peeple keep'a cummin' but de train dun Gone. I have no idea what this refers to. The underground railroad? But "the train done gone" - that's hardly hopeful - not the hope we find in the incarnation. The people keep a coming: how depressing. They're coming across the plains, through raging rivers, in danger from injuns and highwaymen (Dennis Moore on his horse Concord); they suffer from dengee fever and berry berry and bunions and migranes; they wander in the wilderness; they stand in line waiting for a stamp. And throngs of them advance toward the rails, footworn and slipshod, wearied and worn, famished, pushed beyond endurance. Wave after wave breaks upon the tracks only to discover, Ahhh the anguish, the despair, the wailing and gnashing of mashies and nibbling of niblicks, that the Train done Gone. The train is Gone, Done Gone, exerunt, locomotivus fugit, absented, vacated. And still the people keep a coming, continue their itinerary, pass over on in their passage. And what recourse do they have? A continual advancement, their Advent a misadventure peradventure inadvertent vertiginous. De Peeps 'l keep'a combing butter train'don gaw'n: that doesn't help much. They keep coming; the train is already gone.
When I labored over this problem at the Croissant Monde last Sunday after Church, my companions, all seminary trained thinkers, expressed solutions to this conundrum. Solutions that collapsed under the weight of the assertion: these people continue to arrive even in view of the fact that whatever train stops here is already passed through - nothing is said of another train. In fact the emphasis of the song tends toward the conclusion that the Train Done Gone is Gone for Good, for certain, final, fine, fin, without leaving room for the adumbration of a suspicion of a rumor that any kind of locomotion will revive along this way. Better just tear up the tracks. The third out of the last half inning of the last game of the world series has been made, the umpire has signaled, and the last uncorked bottle of champagne has fallen to the ground spewed and emptied on the last sober player of the year celebrating in the victor's clubhouse; the claret jug has been hoisted; the trophies dispensed to victors left and right. Not another inning, not another down, not another click of the clock remains for the aspirant, the hopeful, the expectant. All the potencies of potential and possibility have been drained, dregged and micturated, sopped, sucked up and filtered back to the source. This train is absolutely and irrevocably gone on and still, and yet, impossibly, implausibly, people, human beings like you and me, continue to set out, embark, commence a journey for a point of disembarkation, a certain station, stop, shelter, from where a vehicle of excursion might transport them on parallel tracks, conveying them safely and with all their goods and bodily possessions, wits and faculties, to some place of desire and finality and away from some place about which it might be said that "from there they've done gone." That even before people have commenced their procession toward commencement, the train is done gone. I feel like I've just sung an assertion that 2 plus 3 equals six. It makes no sense. The people keep a coming but the train done gone: what is that? There is no answer. It's neither a comfort, a consolation, a warning or a promise. Who are these people? What is this train? How do the people know where to go or where they're going? Is there a time table? Is there another train? Is there a station agent responsible for feeding and housing, at least diverting and repatriating, all these people: people who've been misled - one can only say that the failure of this song is that people are engaged in futile behavior? I would feel better about singing, "people quit a coming when the train done gone." We could sing, "people begin arriving well in advance of the train's departure." That would be all right, even though people might arrive too far in advance and sleep through the train's departure or starve, if they'd not brought anything to eat. People might also continue to arrive after that train's departure - but not so many as it might be said that they "keep a coming." "Some people might arrive just as the train's leaving and miss it," but they wouldn't keep a coming. If they keep a coming they're like wildebeests crossing a river and drowning. When I was a kid I saw this very thing on one of those PBS nature specials: the wildebeests kept a coming to their doom. None of the near by natives of the region engage in such futile activity - they've learned from nature - unlike the people of this hymn. One of the hallmarks of wisdom literature is that people do learn from nature: God has put nature here for us to learn from the behavior of animals. Perhaps this hymn enjoins us to read Ecclesiastes, Proverbs or the Song of Solomon during Advent. "Thy breasts are like two fawns, but the train done gone." "To every thing there is a season, but the train done gone." "I Wisdom sported with the Lord in the beginning, but the train done gone." While I was with my friends at the Waxing Gibbous, I drew this scene out on a the back of a children's menu - the biggest clean white sheet of paper I could find: people lined up along the hillsides converged enmasse to a set of empty rails, a wisp of smoke coiling from the horizon. Across the plain hot air balloons are ascending in various stages. I thought perhaps the train is done gone, but that doesn't mean the people are at a loss: we may discover ways to embark on our own. What was expected of this train anyway? Was it even certain that it could have contained all the people coming to ride it. Did it even go, punctilious in following it schedule, nearly empty. Would the people want to be on this train? Traveling from Prague to Budapest in 2005 I was with a group that endured a six hour trip where the, according to the conductor, "the dining car didn't go." No sadder words could have been spoken. These words were much sadder than "the train done gone." The people eventually got on the train, but the dining car didn't go - ahhh, what bitter respite! I'm suspicious of this train. It's capricious, perhaps promising more than it can deliver, never intending to carry people to some destination at all. And what kind of destination? Is it markedly different enough, a contrast between aridity and fecundity, to warrant such a mass evacuation of one indeterminate location for another. "The people are remaining in place in deference to the train's indifferent passage." And so drawing balloons that the people might get in seemed a grand solution. People might get some height and some perspective on the whole train done gone situation and judge for themselves. And that is Advent, a time for us to judge for ourselves, to gain some perspective, and perhaps decide that trains of indifferent passage are freighted with too much baggage to warrant our interest. Instead we might discover our own locomotion. "The people were engaged in discovering more habitable and liberated destinations and more certain conveyances than trains, confined to inflexible courses and schedules, might provide."
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Our anniversary is in fifteen days
We returned to Atlanta from London and thus began our first year of marriage, excited about life together.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Imagine, above us, Ouranos
Sing muse the transmission's roaring engine whine
The tread and phalt of asph
The Triumph Spitting fire
Anchises chassis sizzling ceaselessly
The crash clanging craggy waves
Spouting capered whiting ruffian orange
Fluking flounder bottomed surf scuffing
Shore.
O Homer deranged
Ware he'd ear indie
ant elope splay.
And then just as quickly: we were over the bridge and my thoughts returned to normal.
In our rear view mirror the Bridge of Terror flailed its tentacles and banged its masticators in delirium. Its roar flung out after us and I repeated, "who has troubled you Bridge of Terror - No Man that I know. " We made it over with no serious toll upon our senses.
Now I must go to Figgo's and eat. But what: lamb ragu? a salad? something to demonstrate that I am not given wholly to meat eating? Shall I feast on greens like Nebuchadneezer, the roots and flowering of the Earth?
Indeed, the theater seats have been rescued from obscurity and honored with a place in our home. The note I wrote that I republished here actually succeeded in returning them to me. And now they grace our home, waiting for a flat screen TV, where our movies may be displayed and we may eat buckets of pop corn.
Or we may watch the MythsAmerica pageant.
I only wish that we were sitting together tonight, both of us working in Durham and our house sold here in Decatur.
I love her more than words.
Monday, December 10, 2007
A reprint but a good one
Friday, December 07, 2007
Another Annunciation
Actually this is the second annunciation I've posted today, but in the blog it reads first - an instance of time being folded on time. I painted this (as I mentioned in my posting for March where I took this image from) in New Mexico, where it was purchased by my friend Shannon Webster. Now it hangs in his home in Birmingham, AL. This painting is more expressionist and less concerned with the individual Mary or the individual Gabriel. The angel here appears in a flame of fire. Fire is a peculiar symbol for God and is rooted in the Hebrew scripture, notably in Song of Songs 8:6 where it reads "[my memory's translation follows] Love is strong as death and Jealosy harder than sheol; [young's literal translation following] its burnings are burnings of fire a very flame of Jah." This is echoed (notably as well in the burning bush episode) in the New Testament in Jesus' desire in Luke 12 to baptize with fire, and later in Hebrews at the end of chapter 12 where it is said that "our God is a consuming fire."
Today in looking up more information on Mary (via Wikipedia - yeah, I know, but it is a good starting place) I came across the concept of panagia, or Mary of the Sign, where the Lord and sometimes the Trinity are depicted in Mary's womb in a cut away view. The intriguing notion here is that when Mary contained Jesus, she contained the universe as well. My mind immediately went to the possibilities of space travel. This concept does explain gospel fragments found in Egypt, written in Coptic, that describe, seemingly, that during one of Mary's visits to her OB/GYN the position of the big and little dippers reversed for 20 minutes; also contained in these fragments, and a puzzle to scholars, is a reported conversation between Mary and Joseph, in that while she was pregnant, she had to excuse herself, telling Joseph that she had to visit the ladies' room and that "this might take a while." Thus are the travails when you're peeing for the universe. In a later instance, while visiting relatives at a wedding, Mary apparently ate the whole spread, when no one was looking, escaping detection because she was fairly tiny, and the volume of food consumed was enough to feed 200 people. Such are the travails when you're eating for the universe. In some gnostic texts Mary didn't ascend to heaven so much as go behind a bush to relieve herself while on a journey to Ephesus. Some say that she is still there, reading magazines, doing crossword puzzles, and learning French, and that when she finishes the Messiah will return and speak in Duke chapel.
An Annunciation reprised
I painted this annunciation last year and our friend Bob King bought it. Jami told me the other day how she wishes we still had it, but that's how art is: you can't hold on to things. Well you can, but the idea is that paintings get out into the world and hang on different walls where they're appreciated by a vast numbesr of people. The image of the annunciation is so charged for me that I'm bound to paint it again. Not that I'll paint a copy of this one. I do like the mirror element; in the past I've indicated God with a large hand pointing out of a cloud at a small girl reading. This annunciation takes Mary's sexuality into account. The angel, Gabriel, in Jami's words, looks like Snape, Alan Rickman. I suppose with the mirror I'm refering to, among other things, Brokhurst's image called Adolescence. Mirrors figure heavily in art: Vermeer and Van Eyck made great use of them. Manet's Bar at the Follies Bergere uses the mirror as a way to flatten and expand space at once. So is the mirror an indication of God? Does this say something about our image of God being fraught with our own projections, desires and fears? Gabriel has announced God's intentions to Mary and turned away, downcast (much like the angels in Wings of Desire), while Mary gazes at her body's reflection. If I were to recreate this painting as a color field painting it would consist of two vertical bars: deep violet and rich red - these two colors dominate the painting and create a mood of foreboding? Melancholy, perhaps. The prospect of giving birth to the messiah is a somber one and charged with sexual anxiety. We have stories of God impregnating humans: Zeus with Europa, Danae, and Leda. I think that this story is prevelant in other cultures and religions as well. The story of the annunciation resonates with these ancient myths: perhaps not so much for us, but for the first hearers of the gospels, the echoes would be unmistakable. Mary eventually absorbs Aphrodite (and takes her title "star of the sea") and Isis (taking her title "queen of heaven") - so that Mary, as God's vessel, becomes a space ship as well as an ocean going ship. By now though these associations are nearly forgotten when people think of Mary. The protestant tendency is almost reductionistic: to see Mary as simply a girl who gives birth to Jesus (leaving out the clasuse, "who God impregnates.") In the Middle Ages, when piety could not imagine Mary ceasing to be a virgin, even after giving birth, Mary's impregnation is typically depicted through the ear - the Spirit speaks a word (The Word) in her ear. This kind of reverence leads us astray though: When we refuse to imagine God being sullied by the very creation she created, and in maintaining this docetic comception we fall prey to the notion that matter is evil and unworthy of God - a gnostic error. Rabelais teaches us that God immerses himself in creation, rolls in the muck, eats the tripe, knocks up the maiden - and that these activities are the very locus of salvation, the very foundational things that God heals in sending Jesus to us; and it is in these things and through these activities that her creation is reborn. It is jolly, festive, feasting, grotesque (in the sense of hyperbolic abundance being celebrated) and it is for us, his creation. So my next annunciation will be slightly different - or maybe very different.
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Historical re-enactment
Calvino's Cosmicomics has a character that is a dinosaur who lives beyond the age of the terrible lizards (not that they were bad at being lizards). People remember how fearsome dinosaurs were but have forgotten what they looked like. In Calvino's story, the dinosaur goes about his business, falling in love, raising a family, hoping that no one notices what he really is. Even today dinosaurs could lurk among us, selling real estate, managing banks, delivering candy grams.
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
My Palate
Jami tells me that cat brain waves are similar to the brainwaves of someone on LSD. This gave me a new perspective on the lives of our cats: that for them the world is one big Peter Max poster with radiating lines, cubist structure, and futurist indications of movement: like one big Giacomo Balla painting. Cat nip actually gives them relief from this state of affairs. I think I'm remembering this right - I'm sure that Jami will provide a correction if I'm mistaken in this. So understand this about the kittens you see: for them life is a magical mystery tour and you really are the walrus. I am the egg man. The other day, sitting in a glass onion, elevated above the tree tops about 45 feet, I reflected on the course of the sun, how Phaeton's chariot forms that figure eight over the span of the year, and here we are nearing the winter solstice, sacred to Druids, and the Druid heels are near us in Decatur, what with the price of oil, how sustained our clothesline wanderings and trappings are, when an idea occurred to me. I must admit it gave me a start but not a finish, nor a swede, and I ambulated over to the mantel over the fireplace and under the earth's crust, where I gazed upon the firmament, no slack loose mint a firmer meant and former meint, as Frommer's meant a star grazing reville, the boggy woggy bagel boy of companionish Beh. I prayed for strength and a spring in my step and a fall in my foot. Winter went here spring Sumerian Awe Tum - oh great pill o fight. The Pleiades, a pillow flight, take wing and walk, so tired, where wrest ye thimble nimble quick a caroling jangling jaw popping presents of mind, a mime mummer mamma's bo'sun on my shoulder makepeace tanquarey. Gin. Among the flavored vodkas available: merlot and PBR.
*************************************************************************
And now I must return to my paper, a cpe final evaluation. A drab recounting of what I've learned and what I've felt and how I've felt and where I've felt and felt and flannel and cotton blends to make iodine. The bureaucracy of daily life, the Grendel of our times. As we live longer the wait becomes longer. Mark the score Langsam - which seems even more drawn out than the Italian direction Largo - which is equally slow. In high school band we hungered to play Presto or Vivace or Scherzo; Andante gave us fits. Adagio for now.
Yesterday, a mother was helping her son in the ICU. The son was in agony and the mother said, "think of something slow. Think of Brahms." Yes the Passaligia, that would be slow. Not as slow as some Wagner I remember performing. It's the slow movements that require the greatest intensity - fast movements are mainly precision and technique, but slow movements - how the mind wanders. Playing a double whole note at Langsam: it is similar to driving the speed limit on the interstate. Years ago my friend Mark and I were at the Atlanta Symphony when they performed Ligetti's Lontano - a massive set of whole notes. It was a revelation to us. The cherry on top was a woman who got up, threw her stole around her head, and walked out, demonstrably, in a huff. So delightful. I've been to hear other experimental or contemporary pieces at symphony hall, but people are possibly too well trained now - or else the woman in the huff stays away.
One of my favorite pieces of music is Pierre Boulez's Pli Selon Pli, or Fold upon Fold. My blog's title refers to it. It's filled with wonderful bumps and clangs. How I enjoy it. Try to hear the performance with Christine Schafer on Deutsche Grammaphone. Or better yet, simulate the performance with percussive objects at hand. All life is music and music is always right at hand.
Sometimes when I am in the house now there are bumps and clangs. When the cats were here I could just roll over and go back to sleep. Now I hope it's the ice maker. It is all langsam.
I miss Jami. I love her and being away from her so far away is not good for me. I can only hope to amuse myself with arcane projections of art until I fly to Durham this Friday.
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
The CSX rolls through Decatur
I have always loved trains. Some of my first memories drawing were of endlessly figuring the curve of tracks around a bend with curly plumes of smoke. I believed the only real trains were the old steam locomotives; diesels turned me off: where was the romance? The opening credits to Petticoat Junction thrilled me with the smokestack puffing along the rails. At that age I thought nothing about the health issue of people swimming in the water tank. As I grew up I rode trains at theme parks, where fake soldiers and card sharks played out "19th century class struggle scenarios in some locale dissonant with even the slightest historical connection to the purported events" - as I reported in one eighth grade essay on what I did over the summer. Jami and I both have photos of our sojourns in these parks: Maggie Valley and Panama City and I have memories of this happening at Stone Mountain - an unlikely confederate vs yankee shoot out. What would have made sense might have been a KKK vs FBI shoot out - being Stone Mountain and all. When I think about it I am amazed at how much of the history I encountered was reified, preinterpreted, homogenized, and packaged for consumption. Amazing too is that these are the criteria for deconstruction - that is, these states of affairs make deconstruction necessary. When I hear people decry deconstruction for removing certainty from the text, I am reminded of instances where the last thing a text needed was certainty, a stamp of approval, because to give such approval would be to participate in a lie. So let us deconstruct away.
And hence, as I've grown up, I have become less fond of the steam locomotive - at least the old conical smokestack, bilging smoke, while laboriously chugging, chased by Indians, wild bunches, desperadoes, soldiers, and other trains, while gentlemen with derringers jumped from car to car. There is something to be said for the sleek, art deco, streamlined engines of the 20th century, smashing their way across the Scottish moors or the Canadian shield.
I remember when my dad began work at Southern Freight and Tariff Bureau (later called Railroad Publications and referred to as Southern Frightened Giraffe Bureau by those who worked there), when there was still passenger service: how excited I was about the possibility for a family trip on a train. But we never went. Shortly after dad took the job, passenger service was discontinued. The old stations in Covington and surrounding counties became derelict, only decades later being reborn as restaurants. Old tracks have been torn up and the right-of-way has reverted to nature. And now I love these old diesels. When I lived out in New Mexico and I drove between Roswell, NM and Lubbock, TX a lot, I would come up alongside trains or come upon trains, as the road often paralleled the tracks: great long trains traveling fast and I could feel the energy come up through the ground.
Now when I work in my studio trains are just outside my door. Here I've stopped to stand near the edge of the tracks to capture the passage of a freight train from the crossing at Chandler Road past the Carpe Diem restraunt. When the light filled up the lens it took my breath away. I had to check and make sure that I was a good ten feet off the rails. And there was one shot of exactly that, which the shutter didn't cooperate on: the light filing up the lens. And how do you take a shot of thunder? Painting sound is a real challenge. I want to paint thunder.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
psychiatric action figures
Last year I bought an action figure of Van Gogh, which I left in its case. He came with five canvases and a french easel. A french easel is one of those things that fold up into a box and which can be set up outside. It's called a french easel because the english easel requires helpful badgers, an eagle and a donkey that is lost, away from home, on an epic journey of discovery and valor that will test their loyalty and prove their friendship. I think that's more the CS Lewis or Beatrix Potter easel.
Today in church I was scanning the hymnal and came across the hymn "there's a wideness in God's mercy" which I always read as "a wildness in God's mercy". It makes more sense to me that God's mercy is wild than that it be wide. Wideness goes without saying and the fact of it being wide is not interesting to me, not as interesting as that that mercy is wild. God's mercy is untamed, untrammeled, pristine in a natural state. God's mercy sneaks up on you, overflows its boundaries, floods, grows over, blows through. Who knows when God's mercy will bump into you. Wild!
More disturbing is the hymn misreading "while shepherds washed their flocks by night." I can see this as an action figure though: it's not surprising that ancient shepherds washed sheep at night, bonfires blazing, buckets filling troughs. All this time the cattle are lowing, sometimes hitting a C below the staff, and the deer baby sleeps - how does he sleep? Fawningly.
But the little lord Jesus, no crying he makes? Give me a break. Tell me he bawled like a baby. I'm tired of these docetic Christmas hymns. What isn't assumed isn't saved, as the ancient adage goes, and it's important for the incarnation and all that follows from it, that Jesus be typical in terms of feeling and needs.
A friend of mine is sermonizing on Acts 17 - the episode where Paul preaches in Athens. Metzger's textual commentary indicates a great textual variety in this section. The passage begins with Paul being left in Athens where he's disturbed by the profusion of idols. It seemed odd to me that he was disturbed about that: certainly idols are all over the place in that world. It may be the display and splendor of those idols that disturbed Paul. Acts is an interesting book. I think that it only vaguely reflects Paul's actual activity and personality: a memory, a trace, used for a history based on the epic form, like the Aneid and others of that time. Paul is presented as a type and acts according to the rules of honor and shame. Whereas in the letters, Paul is keenly aware of these rules and pictures himself as someone who has no ostensible honor. I'm sure that there are areas where my conjecture can be criticized: sections of letters where Paul is concerned with how his honor is perceived or passages in Acts where Paul acts without recourse to how he's perceived. I think that the preponderance of instances points to a Paul who in his letters works to subvert the honor/shame system of the ancient world, while the Paul of Acts doesn't exhibit that subversive program. The most interesting Paul of course is the one shacking up with Thecla in Spain - essentially the Paul of my imagination. The girl baptized a lion right after she baptized herself (in the only instance of baptizomai in the middle voice in koine literature) in front of friends and family at the Roman equivalent of NASCAR.
Paul and Thecla action figures would be great - accompanied by that lion. Their child, called in utero Pauline, with her full name, Pauline Theologie.
Saturday, December 01, 2007
Now December
Almost 11 months ago Jami and I were in London, on our honeymoon, and we had a wonderful time. I can't wait to go back. I can't wait to walk with Jami along the south bank of the Thames again, visiting the Courtauld and National Gallery, exploring more places, venturing further afield. Sure its cold and wet, especially in January. But cold and wet is part of the ambiance in London. Here's a photo of Nelson's pillar: it's admirable. Nelson had it made as a door stop to a country cottage he planned to retire to. The cottage itself was only partially built when Nelson sailed away for the last time. Some say that he never died but is frozen in a block of artic ice, still living, where he guides the course of the British empire through telepathy and has set up a pen pal correspondence with King Arthur and Charlie Chaplin. Legend says that when Nelson is thawed out he'll return to England, and a new age will dawn, where he'll finish building his cottage.
Speaking of returns from "Death's dream kingdom" and "Death's other kingdom", Jami took three hours Saturday to sit in Duke Chapel in order to hear the Messiah and he never showed up. I say "he" never showed up, but of course, Christ could return as a woman. If he returned as the girl in the Golden Compass that would freak everybody out. I'm all for freaking people out when they're so grounded in their expectations that they're writing God's script for Her; what are the Sinister Derriere books but an attempt to write God's script. Traditionally God takes a pranksterish view to these prewritten scripts, and so Christ coming back as a 12 year old girl and sitting on St Peter's throne shouldn't surprise us: people who are accustomed by the media to seeing only people in expensive suits, who travel with large entourages and security details, as emblematic of power, as worthy of making the 'big' decisions - as if only these people are the only ones worth listening to. Yet it's these people, educated in the world's best schools, who've got the world in such a bad place. How far are we from the monkeys banging femurs in front of a black obelisk, despite all our culture and technology, when our propensity to solve problems through violence is near indistinguishable from early primates.?
Nelson, come back and finish your cottage.